Thursday, May 7, 2015

Research draft 2


 

 

Who to blame ?

(Research about how positive modeling and family conditions shapes a child's identity)

Anning Li

English 201

Professor Matyakubavo

4/28/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

     Children are the future of our nation. Majority of the population is getting older and retiring, this results in young people being responsible for keeping our society functioning. With the great burden on children, they must be trained properly to ensure the flourish future.  What exactly shape the new generation? The family factors has direct relation with a child’s potential development since they mold them through everyday activities. Family factors decided who the child is going to be. Children are born naive and honest,they can not see the ambiguity of things happening. For the most of the time, children will imitate or follow what they see and experience. However, kids are fast learner and easy adopter, it is necessary to provide them positive model and a stable family conditions early in childhood in order to prevent juvenile delinquency.

Providing toddlers and teenagers a positive model is crucial because they can not distinguish whether some thing is good or bad. Many parents often neglected that their own behaviors is a reflect mirror to their child. Parent think their child will only be educated in school. The fact is that parent’s behavior also have great impact on a child. Growing up in a family where parents are alcoholic, thief, robber or drug dealer, the child has higher chances to act the same way. According to a popular debate of nature VS nurture, “ when a identical twins are raised in two environments, their behaviors will be different”(Sarah, M.S,2012). The debate explicitly means that nurture is more important than nature when it comes to the behavior of child. while the nature of child may reveal some physical traits of their parent, nurture is the key component that decides the child’s identity. When two identical twins are exposed to different environment, their genetic inherent plays a small role here. The debate proves that it is extremely important to nurture children under positive modeling, and  parent’s behaviors should lead by example.

   Even though it is crucial to provide positive example for the well development of child, many parent still misbehave. The incarceration of parent causes childhood delinquency and adolescent offense. Recent study shows “the U.S incarceration rate is in parallel with the number of child who experienced parental incarceration” (Will, Whalen and Loper 2014 p.190). It reveals that many fathers and mothers got arrest. The fact is important to know because it has direct relationship with second generation offender. The term second generation offender is used when the offender’s parent were involved in criminal justice system. Research shows child who has incarcerated parent are more likely to have developmental problems such as anti-social behaviors. They mentions that “The experience of parental incarceration places children at risk for later being incarcerated themselves”(Will, Whalen and loper 2014 p.193). All the presumption were proven by theories. Will, Whalen and Loper list of 3 main problems will occur within parental incarceration families, which are: lack of stability within family, lack of supervision of child and development of insecure attachment style. Children most likely join delinquent activities when they are not supervised. In short, kids who grow up without supervision of parent are more likely to commit and become second generation offender.

While the imprison of parent influences child, the separation and absence of parent are worst, it puts child’s life in risk of mortality. When one’s life is in danger, the human nature urged them to survive by any means included kill others. Based on New York Times (2015), a man named Davis, was a juvenile murderer, sentenced for a life term in jail without parole. It means Davis will never have chance to see the outside world again. All of his delinquency was forced by his childhood deprivation. Davis described that he lived in a family with careless mother and a absent father. He mentions how he survive by picking cans and pumped gas for tips and shoplift. Until one day he fell in gangster Disciples, he felt like home. he say “I loved them, they protected me, they were my family,”(ERIK ECKHOLM 2015). In fact, Davis was just a normal kid who seek for a safe harbor. He was not born a bad apple, he was forced to do something in order to survive. Perhaps his parent were present when he was child, and provided a better condition for him. He may not join the gang and become a murder. Davids suggests the failure of his family makes him suffer from both emotional and physical pain. Davis, Instead of become a child at an age who should watch TV cartoon at home, stayed at maximum security jail for 23 hour a day. Who is going to take responsibility for his misbehave? Davis’ story tells us an incomplete family structure really make a mess within a child’s life. parents should never allow their relationship to have impact on child because they are vulnerably physically and mentally.

While a broken home destroyed a childhood, child who live in a domestic violence family would also develop deviant behaviors. The true victim of domestic violence is their children. Although children are previously labeled as silent witness of domestic violent, however this opinion has been topple off by more current qualitative research. Lemmey, malecha, and Mcfarlane (2001) conduct a descriptive research. They discovered that many children who observe violent act against their mothers have greater behavioral problem than children who do not observe such violent. The research argues domestic violence have worst affect on child’s behavior among all kind of violence because the person use violent is the one who provides protection for them, and the effects was worst for girls. As result of domestic violence, there are two different types of effect may form from witnessing it. One is internalizing, and the other is externalizing (Lemmey, malecha, and Mcfarlane 2001). The internalizing often involves in child’s emotional waves while externalizing causes delinquency and aggression. Both internalizing and externalizing behavior expose child to a risky future.

Even though we know parental behavior shape a child, it is still difficult to figure out what exactly lead to delinquency because many thing can be involved. In the modern society, where social hierarchy are distinct, people who have more power stand above others. It is significant, children who born in lower class and lack of material resources often surround by negative environment. Studies have shown the “majority of juvenile offenders come from families living in poverty, the highest percent being people of color or minority groups”(Ray E. Bilderaya 2015). They are isolated in small community with limited social mobility. The neighborhood are most likely in same social class, and they have little interact with higher ranked people as well. When one’s social mobility are constrained, there are little or not progression in their life.

Family economic condition would also affect the quality of a childhood. David, Nicola, and john(2004) observed 1,265 children ( 635 males, 630 females), found that the child who live under poor economic condition or disadvantages have more involvement in crime later.  This argument was supported by strain theory (Merton 1957), it explains the social hierarchy within our society may pressure people to commit crime. The theory shows “Individuals in disadvantaged groups act in ways that predispose them to engage in innovative, but deviant acts to redress these strains(David, Nicola, John 2004 P.956).” In conclusion, that the social-economic deprivation causes stress among young people. Based on the strain theory, young people with poor family may think they are worthless and inferior as compare to rich family child. Often times, those strains predisposed them to delinquency. they act in deviant ways in order to reduce the stress.

Many variety forms of factors that affects childhood development. But what can be done to prevent them from later delinquency? It is not doubt juvenile violence has become a concern in the criminal justice field and there is a vital need for rehabilitation programs for juvenile offenders. However, rehabilitation programs are obviously insufficient for deviant behaviors. Ray E. Bilderaya (2005) argues that as many as 69 % of juvenile delinquent parolees are rearrested for serious crimes within six years of their release. It shows that delinquency have further impact within one’s life, and It is embedded in their mind. It be must be done by two ways, one is remove it’s cause, and second is control it’s effect. The cause of delinquency forms depend on many variables. It can be defined in three main categories: Demographic, increased population of juvenile and environmental factors.

 However, it is hard for anyone to control those three causes. One may argues, child who grown up in bad neighbor could also success in life. Malcolm X, who, was black minority, grown up in worst neighborhood, live without father, yet he become a great civil leader. It must be admit that Malcolm X was good counter claim for the argument. Nonetheless, it is still not strong enough. Malcolm X was growing up around drug dealer, and the environment did have impact on him. He was sentenced at a young age because the absence of his father, and lack of supervision. Moreover, Malcolm ‘s case strengthen the claim that positive modeling would enhance one’s life. He learns knowledge in jail, and in jail he discover the spirit of Elijah Muhammad. Malcolm X educated him self, and yet, if not with the help of Elijah, he could not make it.

The development of child has always been the concern of all parent, they are willing to spend huge amount investment on them. But only material support is not enough, many of them need to spend more time on child and provide them stable family with positive environment because it is what truly decided the future of child. Ray E. Bilderaya (2005) suggests that “Children need to be taught....early in order to live... productive life. This includes discipline with consistency. A parent must be willing to put .....produce a non-delinquent child.” In short, in order to have non-delinquent child, parent must learn to behave in front of their child, and provided them a good learning environment earlier in childhood.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                               Reference

ERIK ECKHOLM APRIL 10, 2015 A Murderer at 14, Then a Lifer, Now a Man Pondering a Future


Fergusson, D., Swain-Campbell, N., & Horwood, J. (2004). How does childhood economic disadvantage lead to crime?. Journal Of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45(5), 956-966.

 

Lemme, D., malecha, A., Mcfarlane, J., Wilson, P., Watson, K., Gist, J.H., & Schultz, P. (2001). Severity of violence against women correlates with behavioral problems in their children. (cover story). Pediatric nursing, 27g(3), 265-270

 

Ray E. Bilderaya 1/27/2015 Juvenile delinquency:Cause and Effect


Sarah Mae Sincero (Sep 16, 2012). Nature and Nurture Debate. Retrieved May 04, 2015 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/nature-vs-nurture-debate

 

Will , J. L, Whalen, M. L, & Loper, A. B. (2014). From one generation to the next: Childhood experiences of antisocial behavior and parental incarceration among adult inmates. Journal of offender rehabilitation, 53(3), 190-210.

No comments:

Post a Comment